ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Exploratory Non-invasive Estimation of Cervical Dilation from Electrohysterography and Maternal Data: A Machine-Learning Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical dilation during labor is commonly assessed through repeated vaginal examinations, which can be uncomfortable, depend on the observer, and are not suitable for continuous monitoring. This pilot study explored whether machine-learning regression could retrospectively estimate cervical dilation using non-invasive abdominal electrohysterography (EHG) recordings and maternal information. Seventy-two 10-min EHG recordings were collected during labor at two Mexican hospitals. Twenty-one EHG features were calculated from nine overlapping 120-s windows and summarized using eight temporal descriptors, generating 168 temporal EHG features. The recording-level low-contraction (LC) and high-contraction (HC) counts, along with maternal and gestational age, were subsequently appended, yielding a 172-feature vector per recording. After removing five recordings with sparse data outside the 4-8 cm dilation range, 67 records remained-50 for model development and 17 for internal testing. In the development phase, feature ranking, screening of 28 regression models, and genetic-algorithm optimization were performed. The genetic algorithm selected five EHG-derived temporal features for a squared-exponential Gaussian process regression model. During fivefold cross-validation within the development set, the optimized model achieved an RMSE of 0.97 cm, r = 0.67, and R
Indexed as
Identifiers
42717183What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.