ReviewThe AAPS journal2026
Immunogenicity Assays Used in Support of Marketing Applications of Oligonucleotide Therapeutics.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oligonucleotide therapeutics (ONT) continue to emerge as a versatile new class of medicines. While relatively small in terms of molecular weight, ONT may trigger formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA), which in turn may impact pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety. Bioanalytical methodology for detection of ADA against protein-based therapeutics is well established, however, detection of ADA against ONT presents its own unique challenges. In this manuscript, the Immunogenicity Sub-team of AAPS Bioanalytical Community Oligonucleotide Discussion Group, reviewed bioanalytical assays used to detect and characterize ADA as reported in documents supporting marketing applications of oligonucleotide therapeutics. Based on the available data and the Authors' own experience, a direct ELISA is by far the most common format used for detection of ADA against ONT. Characterization of ADA neutralizing activity is not performed. No issues with insufficient drug tolerance have been reported and postmarketing requirements to improve assay sensitivity are rare. Data generated in the Authors' laboratories indicate that difficulties with low sensitivity of immunogenicity assays for ONT appear to stem from difficulties in raising and purifying high affinity positive control antibodies. Given the inherently low immunogenic potential of ONTs, generation of positive controls with sufficient affinity and titer may necessitate multiple immunizations with immunogens incorporating repetitive sequence motifs, together with alternation of carrier proteins across immunization cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42717178What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.