ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Communication barriers for d/Deaf people with cancer: a scoping review.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSignificant healthcare disparities can be experienced by d/Deaf individuals, particularly in accessing effective communication and health information. Limited research has examined the experiences of d/Deaf cancer patients or how their interactions with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and communication support professionals (CSPs) influence their quality of care. This scoping review aimed to map current evidence about the communication and unmet needs of d/Deaf cancer patients, educational needs of HCPs and roles of CSPs.
methodsFollowing the Joanna Briggs Institute method for Scoping Reviews, database searches were conducted on PsycInfo, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus, and grey literature was identified. Papers published in English that reported on the experiences of d/Deaf cancer patients and their communication with HCPs and CSPs were included. Thematic analysis was used to identify key descriptive themes.
resultsOnly nine (1 quantitative, 7 qualitative, 1 mixed-methods) papers were included. Most focused on d/Deaf cancer patients (mainly breast cancer); only 1 included HCPs and none examined CSPs. Three main themes and 9 subthemes were identified that negatively impacted d/Deaf cancer patients' views about their healthcare: system-level factors; interpersonal factors and patient-level factors. The HCP-focused paper highlighted that collaboration with interpreting services enhanced communication and patient understanding.
conclusionsDespite limited data, this review highlights multiple barriers d/Deaf patients can encounter when accessing cancer services. Collectively, these may affect effective communication practices and can compromise the quality of care delivered. Data supports accessible educational resources, improved access to qualified medical interpreters and deaf awareness training for HCPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.