ReviewThe AAPS journal2026
Immunogenicity in Approved Adeno-Associated Virus-Based Gene Therapies: A Framework for a Tailored Assessment Strategy.
Review in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy has emerged as a promising approach for treating a variety of genetic disorders by delivering therapeutic genes to target tissues. There have been numerous publications reporting nonclinical assessments of immune responses to various AAV-based gene therapy products (GTPs). However, the immune response data from approved GTPs in humans have not been systematically reviewed, and the utility of the data generated in these clinical studies has not been evaluated. This manuscript is intended as a comprehensive review of the nonclinical and clinical immunogenicity data, with focus on adaptive immunity, from nine AAV-based GTPs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2017 and early 2026. It also offers science-based recommendations to inform the future development of GTPs. The accumulated experience from these approved GTPs support a tailored, risk-based approach to immunogenicity monitoring: pre-existing anti-vector antibodies show limited association to clinical response and cellular immune response measurement via ELISpot have practical limitations in clinical studies. These findings advocate for simplified analytical strategies - tailored to the drug development stage and informed by nonclinical data - that incorporate clinical safety markers such as liver function tests, cardiac damage markers, and transgene protein expression as indicators of clinically meaningful immune responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42717139What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.