ReviewCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
A Scoping Review of Interventional Radiology Curricula for Medical Students and Correlation with Kern's Six-Step Framework for Curriculum Development.
Review in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interventional radiology (IR) plays an increasingly important role in modern healthcare; however, its integration into undergraduate medical education remains inconsistent. This scoping review evaluated IR teaching for medical students against Kern's six-step framework. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases, through July 2026, identified 36 studies examining IR exposure, teaching strategies, and educational outcomes. IR teaching is consistently underrepresented. Educational interventions included didactic teaching, case-based learning, and digital platforms, but were typically implemented as isolated initiatives. Mapping to Kern's framework demonstrated predominant focus on problem identification and educational strategies, with limited attention to needs assessment, implementation, and evaluation. No study addressed all six steps. These findings highlight poor framework alignment and support the development of structured, systematically designed curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42717108What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.