ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Pre-ejaculate - an overlooked body fluid with high amounts of DNA.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-ejaculate is a clear, sperm-free liquid secreted by the male bulbourethral glands. Since it is currently not a subject of routine forensic testing, pre-ejaculate is often overlooked. The aim of this study was to characterize the forensic value of pre-ejaculate: Pre-ejaculate from 58 healthy male donors (aged 20-59) was analyzed with respect to DNA yield and the reactivity of various tests specific for seminal fluid, semen and sperm, respectively. DNA was subsequently extracted, quantified, and subjected to routine forensic STR analysis. We found that the tests for the presence of seminal fluid showed varying reactivity for pre-ejaculate: While the test for semenogelin returned negative in all samples, the test for PSA showed a positive reaction in 84.5% of the samples. The acid phosphatase test returned positive in 29.3% of the samples. Furthermore, ≤ 436 ng DNA were detected, and full STR profiles were obtained in 49 of the 58 analyzed samples. Taken together, these findings show that pre-ejaculate contains high levels of DNA and, thus represents a relevant body fluid in the forensic investigation of cases of sexual assault. The varying sensitivity of tests for seminal fluid implies that positive results may originate from pre-ejaculate even in the absence of seminal fluid or semen. Conversely, negative results may lead to the exclusion of samples from further STR analysis, with the risk of missing crucial case information. Consequently, additional studies are required to confirm the presence of this body fluid and to enable a reliable differentiation between pre-ejaculate and semen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42717103What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.