ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Point-of-care ultrasound for umbilical venous catheter placement and surveillance in neonates: practical guidance and governance.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) are essential in neonatal intensive care, yet malposition and early migration are common and can cause serious hepatic or cardiac injury. We set out a structured, image-based approach to UVC placement and surveillance using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). We undertook a targeted narrative review of literature from 2005 to 2025, drawing on comparative studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and society guidance on neonatal POCUS and vascular access. Findings were synthesised into a continuous bedside workflow covering placement, real-time correction of malposition, surveillance, and governance. POCUS directly visualises the UVC tip at the inferior vena cava-right atrial junction and detects portal, hepatic, and intracardiac malposition more reliably than radiography (reported sensitivity and specificity for cavoatrial localisation > 90% vs 60-70%). Tip migration occurs in 50-90% of neonates within the first 72 h, so a single confirmatory scan at insertion is insufficient. A three-view protocol (situs, subcostal IVC-RA, coronal/oblique) combined with a multi-probe approach reduces misclassification: the curvilinear probe maps the intrahepatic course, the linear probe confirms the tip, and the phased-array probe is reserved for cardiac views. Operator-dependent ultrasound artefact misidentification is a key clinical pitfall that requires multi-planar confirmation and explicit competency standards. Conclusion: A three-view, multi-probe POCUS protocol improves UVC tip confirmation, allows earlier correction of malposition, and detects migration sooner than repeat radiography. Safe local adoption requires recognition of operator-dependent artefact pitfalls within a structured training and governance framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.