ArticleScientific reports2026
"Green spectrophotometric determination of rupatadine, its toxic impurity, and methyl paraben: comparative AI-assisted univariate versus multivariate chemometrics".
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensitive and selective green UV-spectrophotometric univariate and multivariate chemometric methods were developed to resolve the overlapped spectra of rupatadine fumarate (RUP), its impurity desloratadine (DES), and methyl paraben (MP). The univariate approach employed was the dual-wavelength (DW) method. Guided by artificial intelligence (AI) in the selection of the optimal wavelength pair, the determination of RUP was performed at 230 and 284.3 nm, and for MP at 236.6 and 253.8 nm. Among the multivariate methods, ANN demonstrated superior predictive accuracy (lowest RMSEP values), followed by PLS-1 and MCR-ALS, highlighting the power of machine learning for complex mixture resolution, particularly in the presence of the preservative MP. A three-factor, five-level experimental design was adopted to construct a calibration set comprising 25 mixtures with varying component ratios, along with 6 independent validation mixtures. The developed methods were successfully applied to pharmaceutical formulation containing the studied drug and were validated in accordance with International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) guidelines. The results obtained were reliable and reproducible, confirming the suitability of these methods for routine analysis and quality control in laboratories. Moreover, the GLANCE tool (Graphical Layout for Analytical Chemistry Evaluation) offered a clear visual summary of the twelve structured method attributes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.