ArticleNature communications2026
Performance and user response of android's smartphone-based alerts in the 2025 Marmara Ereğlisi earthquake.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging LLMs and social media to understand user perception of smartphone-based earthquake early warnings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive evaluation of Google's Android Earthquake Alert (AEA) system during the Mw 6.2 Marmara Ereğlisi, Türkiye earthquake. AEA detected the event 5.31 seconds after its initiation, alerting over 16 million users. Warning times for weak shaking (MMI III) reached up to 150 seconds, with a median of 56 seconds. While near-source warning windows were shorter, the system achieved 90% true positives and 99% precision overall. The high density of the phone network enabled faster detection than traditional stations, even for this offshore epicenter. Feedback data shows AEA recipients were highly likely to take protective actions, such as "drop, cover, and hold on," or warn others. Timely alerts substantially increased user engagement, perceived usefulness, and future trust. These results highlight how crowd-sourced technology and behavioral insights can effectively enhance seismic resilience on a massive scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.