ArticleNature communications2026
Ultra-sensitive profiling of CRISPR-Cas off-target effects with Tracking-seq2.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultra-sensitive profiling of CRISPR-Cas off-target effects with Tracking-seq2.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate detection of off-target activity in primary human cells is crucial for ensuring the safety of gene therapies, yet existing methods often lack sufficient sensitivity. To address this limitation, we develop Tracking-seq2, an advanced technology that integrates exogenous 5' → 3' exonuclease treatment and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway inhibitors with the original Tracking-seq. Tracking-seq2 exhibits enhanced sensitivity in profiling off-target sites of diverse genome editors-including Cas9, Cas12a, cytosine base editors (CBEs), adenine base editors (ABEs), and prime editors (PEs). Critically, Tracking-seq2 is directly applicable to clinically relevant primary human cell types, such as T cells and CD34
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.