Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42716924›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Cooperation, competition and enforcement in transposon evolution.

Nicholas G Davies, J Arvid Ågren, Kevin R Foster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas G DaviesDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. nicholas.davies@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-1412
J Arvid ÅgrenDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kevin R FosterDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. kevin.foster@path.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-6633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposons are powerful drivers of genome evolution, but we lack a clear understanding of how these selfish genetic elements evolve and co-evolve with their hosts. Here, we develop a new general model of transposon-host co-evolution that incorporates key details of transposon and host biology. Our model reveals that the way that transposons replicate is critical for their evolutionary prognosis. Publicly-replicating transposons (such as DNA transposons), which cooperatively share their replication machinery, are predicted to be self-limiting. However, privately-replicating transposons (such as long interspersed nuclear elements, or LINEs), which do not replicate cooperatively, are under continual selection to increase their duplication rate even to the point of host extinction, a so-called tragedy of the commons. Neither selection against transposons' deleterious effects nor exploitation by parasitic elements is sufficient to prevent host extinction. Instead, our analysis shows that only active suppression by hosts avoids population collapse. In particular, suppression must act post-transcriptionally in order to prevent continuous escalation of the transposon-host genetic conflict. We argue that only with host enforcement of transposons can complex life exist.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularAnimalsDNA ReplicationLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsModels, GeneticSelection, GeneticDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID42716924
PMCPMC13558583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.