ArticleNPJ science of food2026
Machine learning reveals structural determinants of odor detection thresholds and identifies high-potency food odorants.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Odor detection threshold (ODT) quantifies the perceptual potency of volatile compounds and is a key parameter in flavor chemistry. It is widely used to identify key food odorants, calculate odor activity values, and evaluate the contribution of volatiles to overall aroma perception. However, reliable ODT data remain sparse and inconsistent, and are unavailable for many volatiles detected in metabolomics analyses, complicating the identification of key food odorants and the quantitative interpretation of aroma contributions. Here we developed a machine learning framework to predict aqueous ODTs using a curated dataset of 1003 compounds, achieving a test-set R² of 0.83. External validation with 177 independently measured compounds supported the model's predictive utility, with 87.0% of predictions falling within a 10-fold deviation and 97.7% within a 100-fold deviation. Structural analysis suggested that aliphatic acids and nitrogen-containing compounds exhibit relatively high ODTs, whereas acyclic sulfur compounds, methoxypyrazines, haloanisoles, and exocyclic esters display low ODTs. Model-guided screening prioritized candidate high-potency odorants, and human sensory evaluation of 12 representative compounds provided preliminary prospective support for the prioritization workflow. These results provide a computational framework for prioritizing potent food odorants and offer data-driven insights into molecular features associated with odor potency in food aroma chemistry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.