Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42716917›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Locating Power in a Cross-Sectoral Health Promotion Collaboration Addressing HIV and Hepatitis C.

Dan Chamberlain, Robyn Keast, Graham Brown, Cynthia M Webster, Maria Kelly, Joseph S Doyle, Peter Higgs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Locating Power in a Cross-Sectoral Health Promotion Collaboration Addressing HIV and Hepatitis C.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dan ChamberlainARCSHS, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9482-5171
Robyn KeastFaculty of Business, Law and Arts, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-4634
Graham BrownARCSHS, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4901-0974
Cynthia M WebsterDepartment of Marketing, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-2676
Maria KellyCentre for Social Impact, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Joseph S DoyleDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-0833
Peter HiggsBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5587-5379

Funding

Australian Research Council DP210102314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedPower is central to understanding how health promotion networks and collaborations function. Power underpins the relational connectivity, yet its complexity renders it difficult to define. This study explores how power is understood within a health promotion network addressing HIV and Hepatitis C in Victoria, Australia.

methodsInductive interviews were conducted with 30 senior organisational members working in the HIV and Hepatitis C health sector in Victoria, Australia. Participating organisations included community, research, government and health organisations. Interviews were coded in NVivo using an inductive approach, underpinned by a phenomenological framework.

resultsFive themes were identified: multiple dimensions of funding; collaboration and relationships as power; organisations as champions or gatekeepers; the role of evidence in defining the sector; and the role of advocacy in the sector. The different and recognised power mechanisms, through which each part of the sector could have influence, were a valued characteristic of the response.

conclusionThe Victorian HIV and HCV network provides a useful insight into the multiple forms of power within a health promotion network, and how these forms of power helped balance aspects of the power asymmetries in the network. This research indicates the need to consider power in multiple, potentially balancing dimensions when developing policies to strengthen collaborative health promotion practice. SO WHAT?: Understanding the value of multiple forms of power within long-term networks may help strengthen cultures, values, and policies that ensure power dynamics enhance, rather than limit, collaborative practice.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorHealth PromotionHepatitis CHIV InfectionsPower, PsychologicalHumansInterviews as TopicVictoriacollaborationhepatitis CHIVnetworkspowerpublic health

Identifiers

PMID42716917
PMCPMC13558458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.