ArticleAnnals of family medicine2026
Influence of Physician Behaviors on How Patients Interpret Normal Test Results.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReassuring patients that nothing serious is wrong is one of the most common interventions in family medicine. However, medical reassurance can sometimes fail, and it is not yet clear what role the doctor's behavior plays in this regard. We tested the preregistered hypothesis that a doctor's warmth and competence significantly and independently influence patients' responses to normal results from diagnostic testing.
methodsWe used an online convenience sample reporting medium somatic symptom burden (N = 349, mean age 29.9 years, 79% female) and completed an experimental analog study. After presentation of a symptom vignette, participants watched a videotaped medical report in which a doctor provided the results of diagnostic tests, stating that no abnormality had been identified. Whereas the diagnostic information was always the same, the doctor's behavior differed in terms of warmth (high vs low) and competence (high vs low).
resultsParticipants rated the likelihood of a serious disease significantly lower if the doctor showed high warmth and high competence. Further results showed that high warmth and competence also led to improvements in other outcomes, such as a lower desire to seek another doctor's opinion or additional tests. A mediation analysis indicated that the effects of warmth and competence were modulated by the extent to which participants cognitively (de)valued diagnostic information.
conclusionFor patients, diagnostic information does not speak for itself; the doctor's behavior critically determines how they integrate such information. Showing high warmth and competence can help patients put trust in them and update their illness beliefs accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.