ArticleBone & joint open2026
CT-RSA with induced displacement used for assessment of aseptic loosening of distal femur reconstructions with megaprostheses in patients reporting pain.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between experienced pain and findings of suspected pathological movement on CT-radiostereometric analysis (RSA) with induced displacement. Methods: Patients with reported pain after distal femur reconstruction with a megaprosthesis between January 2000 and December 2022 indicated the pain they experienced at rest and during activity using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a pain drawing. Two consecutive CT scans with induced displacement were performed for each patient. The translational and rotational movement between bone and implant in the tibia and femur were calculated and compared with reported pain location and type at rest and during activity. Results: A total of 12 patients were examined; ten had measured movement above the preset cutoff values for pathological movement in either femur, tibia, or both. A large inter-patient variability in translation and rotation was found. The movements for the femur components were up to 3.46 mm/1.14° (translation/rotation). For the tibia components, these values were 2.16 mm/2.95°. Overall, six of 12 patients reported a severe type of pain. All six had a suspected loose implant at the location marked on their pain drawing. Six of 12 patients had a > 30 mm difference on VAS between rest and activity; five of those six had a suspected loose implant according to CT-RSA. Conclusion: CT-RSA with induced displacement appears useful for diagnosing suspected pathological movements in megaprosthesis implants. Pain locations on drawings seem to match detected suspected loose implants. Further studies with repeated CT-RSA examinations are needed to establish reliable cutoff values and assist decisions on revision surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.