ArticleDeutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026
Factors influencing treatment decisions in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Article in Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A large proportion of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is treated with monotherapy although current treatment guidelines emphasize the importance of combination therapies to achieve the treatment goals. Because the reasons for physicians' treatment decisions in routine clinical practice are not well understood, factors influencing these decisions were investigated. Methods: In this multicentre, non-interventional study, 79 patients who started PAH therapy ≤12 months prior to study inclusion were enrolled. Data available per routine clinical practice were collected. Furthermore, physician's rationale for treatment decision was assessed. All analyses were descriptive. Results: Patients' mean age was 64 years. Most patients were female (57.0%) with idiopathic PAH (76.0%) and had ≥5 comorbidities (64.6%). At therapy start the significant reasons for choosing combination therapy or monotherapy were patient's risk (81.5%; Odds ratio, OR: 12.38, p=0.0227) and comorbidity status (56.7%; OR: 0.07, p=0.0004), respectively. The proportion of patients receiving combination therapy increased from 45.6% at therapy start to 78.4% at month 24. Concomitantly, the percentage of low-risk patients increased from 14.5% to 35.1%. A significant greater percentage of patients on initial combination therapy achieved an improvement of World Health Organization functional class (85.2% and 50.0%, respectively; OR: 5.75, p=0.0357) between therapy start and end of observation. A low-risk status was achieved by 27.3% and 50.0% of patients on monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. Discussion: Risk and comorbidity status are the key factors for physicians' choice of treatment regimen. Findings from the study suggest that patients on initial combination therapy could potentially improve their clinical status more effectively, even when they have comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.