ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2026
Effects of Konjac glucosylceramides on cognitive function in cognitively unimpaired older adults with subjective cognitive concerns: a randomized, double-blind, controlled pilot study.
Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDiet-derived bioactive lipids may help maintain cognitive resilience during the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Konjac-derived glucosylceramide (kGlcCer), traditionally used for skin barrier support, has previously been shown to reduce brain amyloid accumulation in individuals with lower baseline amyloid burden. However, earlier studies used cognitive tests with limited sensitivity. The objective of this study was to investigate whether daily intake of kGlcCer improves cognitive performance and influences amyloid-related biomarkers in cognitively unimpaired older adults with subjective cognitive concerns.
designA 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.
participantsForty cognitively unimpaired older adults aged 60-80 years who reported subjective decline in memory or cognitive function were enrolled and randomly assigned to study groups.
interventionParticipants received placebo or kGlcCer at doses of 1.8, 3.6, or 5.4 mg/day for 24 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive outcomes were assessed using the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) Logical Memory I/II, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Coding, and Standard Verbal Paired-Associate Learning Test (S-PA). Brain amyloid accumulation was estimated using plasma amyloid-β (Aβ) composite biomarker levels.
resultsIn this exploratory pilot trial, kGlcCer intake was associated with changes in several cognitive measures, although consistent between-group superiority was not observed across all outcomes. The medium-dose group showed significantly greater improvement in WAIS-IV Coding performance compared with the placebo group. Although significant within-group improvements were observed in several measures in the high-dose group such as immediate and delayed verbal memory assessed by WMS-R Logical Memory I/II, as well as in unrelated word-pair learning on the S-PA, consistent placebo-adjusted between-group differences were not observed across these outcomes. Stratified analysis further revealed kGlcCer intake may be associated with favorable changes in amyloid-related biomarkers in high-dose participants with low baseline amyloid burden. No safety concerns related to kGlcCer intake were observed during the study period.
conclusionThese exploratory findings suggest that kGlcCer may be associated with changes in selected cognitive domains and amyloid-related biomarkers. However, the present pilot study was not powered to establish efficacy, and larger adequately powered randomized trials are required. STUDY ID: UMIN000051463, date of registration: 07-03-2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.