ReviewBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology2026
Neurogenic Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion: A Systematic Review of Central and Pheripheral Nervous System Disorders.
Review in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S): To systematically synthesize published evidence on paradoxical vocal fold motion associated with confirmed central or peripheral neurological disorders, with emphasis on neuroanatomic correlations, clinical presentation, management strategies, and treatment outcomes.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. Six databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar) were searched from inception to December 2025. Studies reporting PVFM associated with a confirmed neurological disorder in patients of any age were included. Eligible designs comprised case reports, case series, and observational studies. Data extraction was performed using predefined criteria, and risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools and the ROBINS-I framework.
resultsEleven studies were included, enrolling 102 patients, of whom 42 (19 pediatric, 23 adult) had paradoxical vocal fold motion in association with a confirmed neurological disorder. Neurological etiologies encompassed brainstem malformations, epilepsy, cerebral palsy, neuromuscular junction disorders, basal ganglia diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, and ion-channelopathies. The review design precluded estimation of the prevalence of neurological causes among all PVFM cases; within individual cohorts, neurological disease was identified in 54% of infants with PVFM, and paradoxical vocal fold motion was documented in 33% of patients with multiple system atrophy. Six of the nine studies with classifiable etiologies involved reversible or treatable conditions and three involved progressive neurodegenerative disease, although most individual patients fell into the latter group because the neurodegenerative cohorts were larger. Treatment directed at the underlying neurological disorder resulted in substantial improvement or resolution in most reversible cases, whereas symptoms often persisted in progressive diseases.
conclusionPVFM is frequently associated with organic neurological disorders and should be recognized as a manifestation of disrupted neural control rather than solely a functional condition. Early neurological evaluation and disease-specific management may improve outcomes, particularly in atypical or refractory presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.