Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42715505›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2026

Personalized Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis for Predicting Outcomes and Tracking Response to Radiotherapy and Pembrolizumab in Localized Sarcomas: Analysis of the SU2C-SARC032 Trial.

Ajay Subramanian, Serey C L Nouth, Neda Nemat-Gorgani, Shaghayegh Soudi, Karla V Ballman, Rachel S Heise, Claire Johns, Timothy J Sears, Siyer Roohani, Reinhardt Krcek and 8 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Predicting Neoantigen Immunogenicity frombioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ajay SubramanianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-7892-886X
Serey C L NouthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0009-0007-3075-0223
Neda Nemat-GorganiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Shaghayegh SoudiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Karla V BallmanDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-0357
Rachel S HeiseDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-7785-4579
Claire JohnsDivision of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Timothy J SearsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-1509
Siyer RoohaniRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8232-4994
Reinhardt KrcekRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-9686-5802
Angela M HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse-Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3668-243X
Kent J WeinholdDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Matt van de RijnDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Brian E BrigmanDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Richard F RiedelDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-5412-8710
Yvonne M MoweryDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-9839-2414
David G KirschRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2086-205X
Everett J ModingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-7913-5351

Funding

Advancing Cancer Therapy through Ground Breaking Research in Radiation BiologyR35CA197616 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI David Guy Kirsch · 2016 to 2026
$10.7M
Non-invasive characterization of human soft tissue sarcoma response to radiation therapyK08CA255425 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MODING, EVERETT JAMES · 2022 to 2025
$1.0M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA255425NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) holds promise for prognostication and disease monitoring in solid tumors. However, rare and heterogenous tumors with low mutational burden like soft tissue sarcomas (STS) present a technical challenge for ctDNA analysis. We investigated the ability of personalized ctDNA analysis to predict outcomes and track response to radiotherapy and pembrolizumab in patients with localized STS.

methodsWe analyzed 313 plasma samples collected pretreatment, postradiotherapy/presurgery, and postsurgery from 106 patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy with or without perioperative pembrolizumab for high-risk, localized STS in the SU2C-SARC032 phase II randomized trial. Personalized ctDNA assays were designed to track a median of 46 somatic mutations per patient. Associations between ctDNA levels and outcomes were assessed using univariable and multivariable models adjusting for clinical risk factors.

resultsPersonalized ctDNA profiling detected baseline ctDNA in 85% of patients. Baseline ctDNA levels correlated with tumor size, grade 3 disease, and expression of genes related to hypoxia and the cell cycle. ctDNA levels pretreatment, after radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy but before surgery, and postsurgery were strongly associated with disease-free and overall survival on univariable and multivariable analyses. Patients treated with pembrolizumab, who had significantly better disease-free survival, had a greater decrease in their ctDNA levels after neoadjuvant therapy. Finally, personalized ctDNA analysis enabled noninvasive subclone tracking and patients with multiple tumor clones detected by ctDNA analysis after surgery had inferior outcomes.

conclusionTumor-informed, personalized profiling enables sensitive ctDNA detection and quantitative monitoring in localized STS, providing independent prognostic information across the perioperative course. These findings support prospective ctDNA-guided interventional trials in STS.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNASarcomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicinePrognosisTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNApembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID42715505
PMCPMC13682727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.