Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42715461›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2026

Application of machine learning techniques to automate speech mispronunciation detection in children and adolescents.

Nazila Ameli, Mahshid Nik Ravesh, Luan Matheus Trindade Dalmazo, Karen Pollock, Daniel DeSantis, Manuel Lagravere, Hollis Lai

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nazila AmeliUniversity of Alberta, Mike Petryk School of Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4685-9692
Mahshid Nik RaveshAutonomous Researcher, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4194-9439
Luan Matheus Trindade DalmazoUniversity of Alberta, Mike Petryk School of Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1589-6482
Karen PollockAutonomous Researcher, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5889-8605
Daniel DeSantisAutonomous Researcher, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2438-6118
Manuel LagravereUniversity of Alberta, Mike Petryk School of Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6797-6361
Hollis LaiUniversity of Alberta, Mike Petryk School of Dentistry, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5531-6622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpeech sound disorders (SSDs) are common in children and can affect academic and psychosocial outcomes. Clinical identification relies on expert auditory-perceptual assessment, which is time-intensive and may vary across raters. Automated screening tools could support triage when access to specialists is limited.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL) classifier for detecting mispronunciation errors in standardized pediatric speech recordings obtained using a structured fricative-focused word elicitation protocol, using expert-adjudicated labels as the reference standard. METHODOLOGY: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed 100 participants (6-18 years) providing 1,800 standardized word recordings. Two expert speech-language pathologists (SLPs) labeled recordings as mispronunciation present vs. absent; disagreements were adjudicated by a third SLP. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were assessed. Audio was denoised and standardized to 16 kHz. A pretrained transformer speech model (WavLM Base+) was fine-tuned for recording-level binary classification. Class imbalance was addressed using augmentation, weighted sampling, and focal loss. Performance was assessed on a held-out test set at the recording level using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, and area under the ROC curve (AUC).

resultsThe overall recording-level prevalence of speech sound errors was 16.15%, with the "th" category (/θ/ + /ð/) being the most frequently mispronounced phoneme group. No significant differences were observed by sex, age group (6-9, 10-13, 14-18 years), or malocclusion status (p > 0.05). Labeling showed strong agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.84; intra-rater reliability 0.89-0.92). On the test set (253 recordings), the model achieved 90.9% accuracy, 77.8% sensitivity, 98.2% specificity, 95.9% precision, and AUC = 0.936.

conclusionsFine-tuned pretrained speech representations demonstrated promising performance for screening pediatric mispronunciation errors under standardized recording conditions using expert labels. The high-specificity profile supports its use as a screening and triage decision-support tool, while future studies are needed to validate performance across broader clinical and real-world settings.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningSpeech Production MeasurementSpeech Sound DisorderAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationPhoneticsReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID42715461
PMCPMC13668468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.