Observational studyEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Oral cavity as a reservoir of respiratory pathogens: microbial dynamics in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
Observational study in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the prevalence, co-occurrence, and temporal dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in oral and tracheal samples from critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
methodsThis observational analytical study included 21 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation who were admitted to an intensive care unit. Oral and tracheal samples were collected within the first 24 h after intubation (Day 0) and again after 48 h (Day 2). Bacterial genomic deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted and analyzed using quantitative realtime polymerase chain reaction. Microbial detection was evaluated qualitatively based on the presence or absence of each microorganism and quantitatively using relative bacterial load analysis. Statistical analyses assessed correlations between oral and tracheal colonization patterns and temporal changes in bacterial load.
resultsMore than 43% of oral and tracheal samples tested positive for at least one investigated pathogen at both collection time points, indicating persistent microbial colonization during mechanical ventilation. Significant positive correlations for Staphylococcus aureus detection were observed between oral and tracheal samples on Day 0 (p=0.0028) and Day 2 (p=0.0021), suggesting a possible association between oral colonization and lower airway microbial presence. Streptococcus pneumoniae detected in initial oral samples showed a significant correlation with tracheal detection after 48 h (p=0.03). Quantitative analyses demonstrated no significant changes in bacterial load over time for most microorganisms. However, Klebsiella pneumoniae showed a significant increase in tracheal bacterial load between Day 0 and Day 2 (p=0.04), with higher tracheal loads than oral samples on Day 2 (p=0.01).
conclusionThe oral cavity may serve as an important reservoir of respiratory pathogens in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. The observed correlations between oral and tracheal colonization and pathogen-specific colonization patterns reinforce the relevance of oral health management in critical care settings. In particular, the increase in tracheal Klebsiella pneumoniae load suggests that lower airway proliferation may occur during mechanical ventilation independently of simultaneous increases in oral bacterial load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.