ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2026
In-House 3D Planning for Corrective Osteotomy of the Distal Radius: Prospective Cohort Study With 1-Year Radiological and Clinical Follow-Up.
Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distal radius malunions occur in 5% to 17% of fractures and may lead to pain and functional impairment. While 3D surgical planning with patient-specific guides has demonstrated high accuracy and reduced fluoroscopy use compared with conventional 2D techniques, its routine clinical implementation remains limited, particularly for in-house hospital-based workflows. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the precision of corrective osteotomy for distal radius malunions using in-house-designed 3D patient-specific surgical guides 1 year after surgery. Secondary objectives were to assess clinical and patient-reported outcomes and document intraoperative fluoroscopy use. Methods: Corrective osteotomies of extra-articular distal radius malunions were performed in 16 consecutive patients using in-house 3D surgical planning and patient-specific surgical guides. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing preoperative plans with 1-year postoperative computed tomography-based 3D models, assessing ulnar variance, volar tilt, and radial inclination. Acceptable error margins were defined as 5° or less for volar tilt and 2 mm or less for ulnar variance. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using patient-reported outcome measures and range of motion, lift, grip, and torque strength measurements. Results: The mean absolute error was 1 (SD 0.8) mm in ulnar variance, 4.9° (SD 2.7°) in volar tilt, and 1.9° (SD 3.6°) in radial inclination. The corrections were within predefined equivalence bounds of the virtual plans in terms of ulnar variance but not volar tilt. Significant improvements were observed in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores; pain during activity; pain at rest; lift strength; wrist flexion; and ulnar deviation. In total, 12.5% (2/16) of the patients experienced complications following concomitant ulnar shortening procedures and were transferred to standard care. The median intraoperative fluoroscopy duration was 56 (IQR 26-72) seconds. Conclusions: In-house 3D planning was feasible and associated with generally favorable radiological and clinical outcomes at 1 year. However, the predefined equivalence criterion was not achieved for volar tilt, and the findings should be interpreted considering the small sample size and observed complications. In-house 3D planning supports continuous surgical refinement and quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.