ArticlePloS one2026
Correlation assessment of SARS-CoV-2 variants and their subvariants present in clinical and wastewater samples in Oregon, USA (February 7, 2021 - February 26, 2022) using the Freyja bioinformatics approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWastewater surveillance is a valuable tool for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 at the community level. As the virus diversified into many variants and subvariants that share overlapping mutations, resolving them accurately from wastewater becomes a key bioinformatic challenge. OBJECTIVES AND
aimsThis study evaluated two distinct bioinformatic approaches, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and Freyja, for identifying SARS-CoV-2 variants and subvariants in Oregon wastewater samples collected from February 2021 to February 2022.
methodsThe MLST approach identified SARS-CoV-2 variants using unique mutations curated from clinical samples. In contrast, the Freyja approach resolved variant and subvariant abundances using genome wide mutation profiles weighted by sequencing depth. In this study, the variant and subvariants relative abundances produced by both approaches were compared against those observed in clinical surveillance data.
resultsBoth approaches identified SARS-CoV-2 variants at relative abundances that agreed closely with those observed in clinical surveillance data. However, only the Freyja approach identified over 200 Delta subvariants, divided into three clades (21A, 21I and 21J) and two levels (Level 1 and 2) based on Pango subvariants. Delta subvariants showed strong agreement at Level 1 subvariants (rs = 0.892-0.944), while agreement at Level 2 subvariants was inconsistent (rs = 0.324-0.903).
conclusionsThe Freyja approach provided enhanced resolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants and subvariants in wastewater, at abundances that agreed with clinical surveillance. This added resolution is a critical advantage for public health surveillance as SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve and share mutations across variants and subvariants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.