ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Barriers and opportunities to addressing social determinants of malaria in Wakiso District, Uganda.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria remains a significant public health threat in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Uganda, where it is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. There is limited evidence on factors related to social determinants within ongoing malaria control efforts in the country. This study explored barriers and opportunities in addressing the social determinants of malaria in Uganda. A qualitative study was conducted in Wakiso district. Data were collected through 10 focus group discussions with community members and community health workers (CHWs), 11 in-depth interviews with heads of households, and 14 key informant interviews with local leaders, health officials, and non-governmental organisation (NGO) staff. Participants were purposively selected based on their knowledge and experience regarding malaria. Data were thematically analyzed using Atlas.ti. (version 6) and Nvivo (version 14). The study identified three key barriers and two opportunities to addressing the social determinants of malaria. The barriers were: 1. a curative-focused approach in national policies and private healthcare highlighting minimal commitment in addressing these determinants; 2. inadequate coordination among government institutions and partner organisations in addressing social determinants of malaria; and 3. complacency at both community and government levels due to malaria's endemic nature. The opportunities identified were: 1. the presence of multiple stakeholders actively involved in malaria control including the Ministry of Health and other entities such as NGOs; and 2. the existence of robust government structures at national, district, and community levels including CHWs, health inspectors, malaria focal persons and the model homes initiative which provide a strong foundation to address social determinants of malaria in the country. Despite opportunities in addressing the social determinants of malaria, several barriers were identified. Overcoming these barriers requires a shift towards integrated public health strategies that advocate prevention, foster robust coordination, and leverage stakeholder engagement including communities to contribute to malaria elimination.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.