SynthesisPloS one2026
Individual differences in emotional reactivity: A multidimensional systematic review across the big five.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmotional reactivity reflects how individuals respond to emotional stimuli and can be characterized by multiple dimensions, including intensity, sensitivity, and persistence. Together with dispositional tendencies toward positive and negative emotional experiences, these dimensions define an individual's emotional profile. Despite substantial research, evidence remains fragmented, with a predominant emphasis on Neuroticism and negative emotions, hindering a comprehensive understanding of emotional reactivity across the Big Five personality traits.
methodsThis systematic review synthesized evidence on how the Big Five personality traits relate to core domains of emotional reactivity, including intensity, sensitivity, persistence, and the frequency of positive and negative emotional experiences. A total of thirty records, comprising 31 studies published between 1999 and 2024 and yielding 50 independent samples, were included and analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach. The study protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO under CRD420251067878.
resultsPersonality traits showed distinct patterns of emotional reactivity across multiple domains. Neuroticism displayed the most consistently maladaptive profile, characterized by heightened negative affect, greater sensitivity to stressors, and prolonged emotional recovery. Extraversion and Conscientiousness were generally associated with more adaptive emotional profiles, particularly greater positive emotionality. Openness to Experience showed a more heterogeneous profile, including heightened sensitivity and divergence between subjective and physiological responses, whereas Agreeableness reflected a predominantly prosocial profile with context-dependent variation in negative emotional responses.
conclusionsThe findings support a multidimensional conceptualization of emotional reactivity across the Big Five personality traits. This perspective may improve understanding of individual differences in emotional functioning and mental health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.