ArticlePloS one2026
Telehealth autism evaluation under suboptimal network conditions: Technical parameters and clinical implications.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telehealth expands access to autism diagnostics, but scoring reliability depends on connection stability. Using an optical-fiber testbed, we imposed controlled packet loss and Wi-Fi attenuation to derive four freeze patterns (1-second freezes every 16.7, 11.1, 8.3, or 5.0 seconds), then applied these to 10 children's BOSA videos (40 clips) scored by four blinded psychologists. Analyses included Fisher's exact tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction, Spearman correlation, and per-item logistic regression with Bonferroni correction. Performance degraded in a dose-dependent manner rather than collapsing: below a Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) of -70 dBm or above ~0.04% packet loss, freeze frequency increased from ~1/16.7 s to ~1/5.0 s. Time-sensitive items-Spontaneous Joint Attention (B10), Integration of Gaze and Behavior (B4), Immediate Echolalia (A4), and Stereotyped/Idiosyncratic Language (A5)-were 4-9 × more likely to be coded unscorable, and poorer stream quality correlated with more unscored items (ρ ≈ -0.58). Importantly, overall BOSA scoring remained stable, with no individual item reaching significance after correction and substantial inter-rater consistency under mild degradation (ICC = 0.93, Cohen's κ = 0.76), indicating robustness to moderate degradation. In this pilot study, these results support BOSA as a first-line option when packet loss remains below ~0.04% and RSSI stays above -70 dBm, pending validation in larger, more diverse cohorts. Where possible, using wired connections and awareness of item-level sensitivities can further preserve diagnostic confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.