ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Optimizing peer-led health interventions: A social network analysis approach for identifying influential fishermen in Malawi.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social network interventions (SNIs) can leverage influential individuals within personal networks to amplify health behavior adoption and intervention diffusion. While SNIs are potentially effective in enhancing uptake of HIV prevention and other interventions, identifying optimal peer leaders remains challenging. This study assessed how social network-based approaches can improve peer leader identification compared to non-structural approaches (i.e., those that do not use network data for promoter selection). Between 8th October 2024 and 31st March 2025, we mapped the social connections among fishermen in two communities in Mangochi, Malawi. The communities had previously participated in a cluster-randomized trial (FISH), which aimed to create demand among fishermen for HIV and schistosomiasis services via peer-nominated leaders. Using Network Canvas and a photographic census, we conducted a network survey, capturing ties, support roles and interaction frequency. Whole-network maps were constructed, centrality measures and the key player problem positive (KPP-POS) algorithm were applied to identify the highest-ranking individuals as potential promoters. We compared the reach (i.e., proportion of nodes within two steps of a promoter) of peer-nominated leaders selected by FISH to these sociometric methods. We recruited 370 of 397 eligible fishermen (mean age 34.8years [SD 13.11]). Both communities exhibited sparse, low-reciprocity networks with long path lengths. One network had two dense cores, while the other featured a single core. There was no evidence of assortative mixing by education, age or village of residence. FISH trial peer leaders were not consistently central in the constructed maps. The KPP-POS algorithm identified alternative, more dispersed nodes, achieving the highest reach (66% in F001; 75% in F024) versus in-degree (58%, 67%), closeness (58%, 68%), betweenness (58%, 69%) and eigenvector (60%, 68%) promoter sets. Our findings highlight that strategically identified promoters can achieve good reach within social networks, crucial for effective public health programming in complex settings like fishing communities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.