Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42715213›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Optimizing peer-led health interventions: A social network analysis approach for identifying influential fishermen in Malawi.

Madalo Mukoka, Alison Price, Marriott Nliwasa, Owen Mhango, Mphatso Mwapasa, Moses K Kumwenda, Hussein H Twabi, Robina Semphere, Takondwa C Msosa, Chisomo Msefula and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Madalo MukokaHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9656-8255
Alison PriceMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Marriott NliwasaHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Owen MhangoHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Mphatso MwapasaHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8402-6133
Moses K KumwendaHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Hussein H TwabiHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4473-296X
Robina SemphereHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Takondwa C MsosaHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Chisomo MsefulaHelse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, Department of Pathology, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2304-886X
Augustine T ChokoMalawi-Liverpool-Welcome Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Guy HarlingInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Katherine FieldingDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and International Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6524-3754

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social network interventions (SNIs) can leverage influential individuals within personal networks to amplify health behavior adoption and intervention diffusion. While SNIs are potentially effective in enhancing uptake of HIV prevention and other interventions, identifying optimal peer leaders remains challenging. This study assessed how social network-based approaches can improve peer leader identification compared to non-structural approaches (i.e., those that do not use network data for promoter selection). Between 8th October 2024 and 31st March 2025, we mapped the social connections among fishermen in two communities in Mangochi, Malawi. The communities had previously participated in a cluster-randomized trial (FISH), which aimed to create demand among fishermen for HIV and schistosomiasis services via peer-nominated leaders. Using Network Canvas and a photographic census, we conducted a network survey, capturing ties, support roles and interaction frequency. Whole-network maps were constructed, centrality measures and the key player problem positive (KPP-POS) algorithm were applied to identify the highest-ranking individuals as potential promoters. We compared the reach (i.e., proportion of nodes within two steps of a promoter) of peer-nominated leaders selected by FISH to these sociometric methods. We recruited 370 of 397 eligible fishermen (mean age 34.8years [SD 13.11]). Both communities exhibited sparse, low-reciprocity networks with long path lengths. One network had two dense cores, while the other featured a single core. There was no evidence of assortative mixing by education, age or village of residence. FISH trial peer leaders were not consistently central in the constructed maps. The KPP-POS algorithm identified alternative, more dispersed nodes, achieving the highest reach (66% in F001; 75% in F024) versus in-degree (58%, 67%), closeness (58%, 68%), betweenness (58%, 69%) and eigenvector (60%, 68%) promoter sets. Our findings highlight that strategically identified promoters can achieve good reach within social networks, crucial for effective public health programming in complex settings like fishing communities.

Identifiers

PMID42715213
PMCPMC13557381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.