Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42715205›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Accessible, robust ultrahigh-throughput microbiome analysis via integration of uniform droplet-templated emulsification and FACS.

Wannes Nauwynck, Karoline Faust, Nico Boon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wannes NauwynckDepartment of Biotechnology, Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3471-8833
Karoline FaustDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Molecular Bacteriology (Rega Institute), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-2803
Nico BoonDepartment of Biotechnology, Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial phenotypes vary at the single-cell level, shaping key community traits like resilience and adaptability. Yet, current methods either lack resolution (e.g., culturing, sequencing), are too costly, or technically complex, limiting widespread use. To address this gap, we introduce and validate a workflow called DE-SWIRL (Double Emulsion-Sorting Workflow with sImple, Rapid emuLsification), an accessible, low-cost workflow enabling ultrahigh-throughput (~107 microcultures/experiment) screening of individual microbial cells. DE-SWIRL integrates a published droplet-templated emulsification protocol producing uniform double emulsions from monodisperse single emulsions with Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). We validated that double emulsions of 6 and 24 pL can be reliably formed, with ~45% droplet survival. To address persistent large-particle contaminants, we validated a gating strategy and show it enables accurate screening and sorting. When starting from a monodisperse single emulsion population, oil layer variability is higher for droplet-templated emulsification than for on-chip microfluidics, but maintains a comparably uniform core emulsion while offering substantial time savings. We demonstrate DE-SWIRL's utility by isolating viable strains from a synthetic community with up to 99% sorting purity and isolating droplet cocultures from a mixed community. This workflow provides a fast, accessible, and affordable workflow for screening entire microbiomes at a single-cell level using a fluorescent assay of interest.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMicrobiotaEmulsionsEmulsions

Identifiers

PMID42715205
PMCPMC13557392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.