ArticlePloS one2026
Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) demonstrate inhibitory control in a detour task.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhibitory control-or the suppression of an impulsive, or prepotent, response in favor of a less obvious, but more effective behavior-is an important aspect of executive function, decision-making, and cognitive flexibility. Although elephants have large brains and behave flexibly, little is known about their capacity for inhibitory control, which limits our understanding of its evolution across species. We tested 16 (8M, 8F, 4-60 yrs) Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) at the National Elephant Institute in Thailand using a classic detour paradigm. Elephants first learned to reach their trunk around an opaque box to obtain food from a single opening. We then presented them with a transparent box with front-facing holes, where subjects needed to continue to reach around the box while inhibiting the impulse to reach straight toward the visible food and front-facing odor cues. We found that elephants performed similarly when detouring around both opaque and transparent boxes. This may indicate a strong ability to inhibit the impulse to reach straight forward, but may also indicate that the transparent box did not produce cues strong enough to elicit a prepotent response. In addition, we conducted trials in which we changed the box orientation so that elephants needed to inhibit using a previously learned response (i.e., a direction in which they had previously detoured) in favor of detouring in the newly changed direction. Here, we found evidence for a strong prepotent response: elephants' latency to detour around the box significantly increased when the box orientation changed. However, detour performance quickly improved across trials in which the orientation was constant, indicating effective inhibition of the previously learned response. Interestingly, performance in these trials worsened with age, revealing potential evidence for cognitive decline. This study provides some of the first evidence for inhibitory control in this species, and furthers our understanding of convergent cognitive evolution across distantly related taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.