ArticlePloS one2026
Codon bias variation in Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStaphylococcus aureus causes a multiplicity of human diseases acquired in community and healthcare settings alike around the globe. While most studies focus on coding changes to assess genome evolution and study genetic adaptation, interrogation of silent mutations in the form of synonymous codon usage bias is less well-studied. As such, understanding of patterns in codon bias at the gene and genome levels, and how codon bias impacts protein expression in S. aureus remains incomplete.
methodsThe codon bias of 2,565 protein encoding genes from NCTC 8325 was queried against all publicly available closed S. aureus genomes. Using public BioSample data, genomes were sorted by disease state, submitting institution, and collection site. Codon bias was assessed at the level of gene and genome using the codon adaptation index (CAI), calculated using 30S and 50S ribosomal genes. Gene set enrichment analysis was applied to determine associations between physiological functions, CAI gene scores, and interquartile ranges. CAI scores were also compared to an in vitro S. aureus proteomics database to correlate codon bias and protein expression.
resultsCAI scores varied within and between isolates at the gene and genome levels. Genes with ribosome-associated functions were most enriched among high CAI genes, and had low CAI interquartile ranges (IQR), suggesting selective pressure to maintain high expression of these genes across all S. aureus isolates. Genome sequences submitted by Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya were most different from others. For the LAC USA 300 strain, CAI and protein expression were moderately positively correlated (cor = 0.534, p < 2.2e-16).
conclusionsCodon bias in S. aureus was shown to vary between gene, and to be a source of genetic variation between isolates; CAI and in vitro protein expression were positively correlated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.