ArticlePloS one2026
Looking through different lenses at meeting places in disadvantaged Dutch neighbourhoods: A qualitative participatory study assessing needs, barriers and success elements for women with non-Western migration backgrounds and teenage girls.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe living environment can significantly influence health negatively, particularly in disadvantaged neighbourhoods where risk factors and limited resources converge. Social cohesion and inclusive meeting places promote well-being, yet little is known about what makes these spaces accessible and meaningful for specific groups. This study explored how neighbourhood meeting places can better align with the needs of two often underrepresented groups: women with a non-Western migration background and teenage girls (12-18 years old), in four disadvantaged Dutch neighbourhoods.
methodsA qualitative participatory study was conducted in four municipalities in the Netherlands in March 2024 - June 2025. Data were collected through a neighbourhood orientation, focus groups, PhotoVoice, interviews, and validation sessions with neighbourhood workers, women, and girls, to assess the needs, barriers and success elements regarding meeting places. Thematic analysis was guided by the Movement Friendly Environment model, organizing data into four domains: physical design (hardware), social use (software), organizational structures (orgware), and perception (mindware).
resultsIn total, 97 participants contributed: 29 neighbourhood workers, 44 women, and 24 girls. The results, structured according to the four 'wares,' revealed a broad range of needs and experiences regarding meeting places. Women and girls valued clean, nearby, and welcoming public spaces with sufficient seating, safety, greenery and gender-sensitive design. Preferred activities included cooking, language learning, informal gatherings, and sports, ideally in familiar, culturally sensitive, and child-friendly settings. Ownership, trust and feelings of safety were important factors in fostering engagement. Barriers included unclear communication, language difficulties, lack of childcare, and feelings of unsafety. Neighbourhood workers played an important role in outreach, facilitation, and empowerment.
conclusionAccessible, inclusive and meaningful meeting places for women and teenage girls emerge when physical, social, and organizational elements are aligned and mutually reinforcing, and are integrated with citizen's perception, participation, engagement, and strong social networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.