Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42715163›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

"They're just shifting a problem": A qualitative study of stakeholder perceptions of the welfare implications of UK rescue dog importation.

Lisa J Wallis, Alisha Murphy, Gina Pinchbeck, Jenny Stavisky, Louise Buckley, Carri Westgarth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa J WallisDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3931-3250
Alisha MurphySchool of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Gina PinchbeckDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jenny StaviskyVetPartners, York, United Kingdom.
Louise BuckleyDeanery of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Carri WestgarthDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0471-2761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of rescue dogs being imported into the UK has increased significantly in recent years but research into the welfare implications of this practice is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate various stakeholder and owner experiences of behavioural and health problems in imported rescue dogs. Thirty interviews and four focus groups (totalling n = 54) were conducted with overseas and UK rescue representatives, trainers, transporters, veterinary surgeons, animal health officers, government representatives and dog fosterers and owners in the UK. In addition, eighteen online publicly available forum threads were selected using purposive sampling. Inductive coding of these data employing thematic analysis resulted in seven main themes. Related to health and behaviour the themes identified were: unfit for transport, welfare during transport, infectious disease, novelty, agency, and caregiver expectations. The final theme related to regulation and enforcement challenges with sub themes around: non-compliance, lack of resources, communication, jurisdiction and lack of cross-sector regulation. Overall, caregiver expectations often did not align with reality after the dog arrived, leading to costly surprises for new owners. Further, some dogs were felt to be not well-matched for the household and displayed challenging behaviours. The rescue organisation was perceived to have moral responsibilities to provide accurate information and pre-and post-adoption support, but this was felt to be inconsistently provided. Stakeholders perceive a number of health and behavioural welfare issues associated with importing rescue dogs, but preventing these is somewhat difficult due to the challenges in regulating and monitoring animal movements between countries. Greater education about expectations of imported rescue dog health and behaviour is recommended, alongside improved monitoring of rescue organisation and transport processes, in order to protect animal welfare.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAnimalsDogsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansOwnershipQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42715163
PMCPMC13557394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.