ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2026
Acute phase reactants in paediatric chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis: implications for diagnosis and correlation with disease phenotype.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe role of acute phase reactants (APRs) in the diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is controversial. Many patients have moderate elevation and some have normal levels. Markedly elevated APRs are more likely to have CNO mimickers that cause lower classification scores. This study aims to investigate how elevated APRs affect the classification of CNO at the diagnosis and their relationship with patient and disease characteristics.
methodsThis retrospective single-centre study included patients diagnosed with CNO who were grouped according to APRs at diagnosis: markedly elevated APRs (CRP ≥30 mg/l and/or ESR ≥60 mm/h as proposed by classification criteria) and normal-to-moderately elevated APRs. Clinical and imaging findings, and treatment modalities were compared between groups.
resultsFifty-one patients with CNO were included into the study; 31% of them (n = 16) were classified in markedly elevated APRs group. They exhibited lower classification scores and haemoglobin, higher platelet and ferritin concentrations, more extensive involvement of CNO, and a higher likelihood for CNO-associated diseases. Median total number of bone lesions was significantly higher in this group, and a moderate correlation was observed between number of bone lesions and CRP. Pelvic bone, clavicle and sacroiliac joint involvement were significantly more common in patients with markedly elevated APRs.
conclusionMarkedly elevated APRs are observed in a substantial subset of CNO patients that may cause classification limitations. These patients show more severe systemic inflammation, more extensive involvement, particularly in clavicle, pelvis and sacroiliac joints, and a higher likelihood of CNO-associated diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.