Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42714911›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

State-Funded Health Insurance Expansion for Noncitizen Immigrants and Hospital Uncompensated Care.

Aresha Martinez-Cardoso, Bin Yu, Apurva Nayak, Robert Kaestner, Arturo Vargas Bustamante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aresha Martinez-CardosoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Bin YuDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Apurva NayakDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Robert KaestnerHarris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Arturo Vargas BustamanteDepartment of Health Services and Policy, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Undocumented and many noncitizen immigrants are largely excluded from federally funded health insurance programs, creating substantial gaps in health coverage and financial strain on safety-net hospitals that disproportionately serve these populations through uncompensated care. Several states have implemented state-funded health coverage expansions for immigrants, but the financial implications of these policies remain poorly understood. Objective: To examine whether Health Benefits for Immigrant Seniors (HBIS) and Health Benefits for Immigrant Adults (HBIA) programs in Illinois were associated with changes in hospitals' charity care and bad debt. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of nonfederal general medical and surgical hospitals from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023, used Healthcare Cost Report Information System data. Difference-in-differences regression compared hospital financial outcomes in Illinois with hospitals in comparison states. Difference-in-differences-in-differences models examined variation by county share of immigrant populations. Analysis was performed from October 1, 2024, to June 12, 2026. Exposure: Illinois HBIA and HBIS programs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital-reported bad debt and charity care. Results: The study included 161 hospitals in Illinois and 1902 hospitals in comparison states. Illinois hospitals were located in counties with a higher share of Hispanic population (mean [SD], 11.4% [10.1%] vs 9.1% [10.6%]; standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.23) and higher median income ($58 121 [range, $34 982-$100 325] vs $56 102 [range, $23 968-$134 050]; SMD, 0.17), but a lower share of uninsured population (mean [SD], 7.8% [2.0%] vs 9.1% [3.5%]; SMD, -0.68). Illinois (treatment) and control hospitals were largely comparable on hospital-level attributes. In adjusted difference-in-differences models, the HBIA and HBIS programs were associated with declines in bad debt (-0.08 [95% CI, -0.11 to -0.04), adjusted bad debt (-0.13 [95% CI, -0.17 to -0.09), charity care (-0.19 [95% CI, -0.26 to -0.13), and adjusted charity care (-0.19 [95% CI, -0.27 to -0.12). Results were robust in entropy-balanced models, which showed reductions for adjusted bad debt (-0.14 [95% CI, -0.20 to -0.09]) and adjusted charity care (-0.15 [95% CI, -0.23 to -0.07). Estimated reductions in charity care were more sensitive to potential violations of the parallel trends assumption than reductions in bad debt. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of hospitals in Illinois and comparison states, the HBIA and HBIS programs were associated with significant reductions in hospital bad debt and suggestive reductions in charity care. State-funded health insurance expansions for undocumented and noncitizen immigrants were associated with improved hospital financial stability and may help address persistent gaps in insurance coverage among immigrants.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthUncompensated CareUndocumented ImmigrantsCohort StudiesHumansIllinoisMedical DebtSafety-net ProvidersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42714911
PMCPMC13559608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.