Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42714899›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2026

Population-Level Implications of Parental Similarity for the Prevalence and Heritability of Psychiatric Disorders.

Saeid Rasekhi Dehkordi, Joeri Meijsen, Ryan Waples, Richard Zetterberg, Dorte Helenius, Giorgos Athanasiadis, Morteza Vaez, John Shorter, Simone Montalbano, Kajsa-Lotta Hellberg and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Saeid Rasekhi DehkordiInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Joeri MeijsenInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Ryan WaplesInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Richard ZetterbergInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Dorte HeleniusInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Giorgos AthanasiadisInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Morteza VaezInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
John ShorterInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Simone MontalbanoInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Kajsa-Lotta HellbergInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Morten Dybdahl KrebsInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Andrés IngasonInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Thomas WergeInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Alfonso BuilInstitute of Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Services, Amager and Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Partner similarity for psychiatric traits, often attributed to assortative mating, has been repeatedly documented, but its theoretical consequences for the prevalence and heritability of psychiatric disorders have been examined only under strong and often unrealistic assumptions and have never been empirically estimated using population-based data. Objective: To quantify the extent of partner similarity for psychiatric and somatic disorders and to estimate its empirical intergenerational implications for the prevalence and heritability of psychiatric disorders and their corresponding somatic comorbidities. Design, Settings, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used linked nationwide Danish registry data on residents born between 1969 and 2017. Parental pairs and offspring were identified through the Danish Civil Registration System, and psychiatric and somatic diagnoses were obtained from national health registers. Data were analyzed from 2021 to 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: Parental correlations for psychiatric and somatic disorders were calculated. Prevalence and heritability in the observed data were then compared with corresponding estimates under a random mating scenario. Results: Among 4 244 585 Danish residents born between 1969 and 2017 (2 200 795 male [51.9%]; mean [SD] age, 26.3 [13.5] years for males and 25.9 [13.5] years for females), we identified 549 541 parental couples and 822 209 offspring. Parental correlations were substantial for psychiatric disorders overall (r = 0.28; SE, 0.003), with the highest within-disorder correlation observed for schizophrenia (r = 0.38; SE, 0.015) and the lowest for anorexia (r = 0.11; SE, 0.029). Cross-disorder correlations ranged from 0.01 to 0.26. Parental correlations were also observed for somatic illnesses but were weaker (r = 0.03-0.14) and were almost entirely accounted for by comorbid psychiatric disorders. Simulations further showed that this pattern of nonrandom mating inflated the prevalence and family-based heritability of any psychiatric disorder by 1.8% and 12.5%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that partner similarity for psychiatric disorders is substantial and includes both within- and cross-disorder patterns, suggesting assortative mating alongside other mechanisms that may generate similarity between coparents. Regardless of its underlying mechanisms, this structure contributes meaningfully to observed family-based heritability and prevalence and leads to clustering of familial disease risk with important societal and public health implications.

Identifiers

PMID42714899
PMCPMC13559730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.