ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2026
Bacterial and archaeal communities reflect long-term pH shift induced by ash fertilization in boreal peatland forest soils.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ash fertilization is a forest management practice used to improve forest growth in boreal peatland forests. It impacts soil chemistry, vegetation, and soil organisms, yet little is known about its long-term impacts on soil microbial communities. Here, we focus on the long-term impacts of ash fertilization on the soil microbiome of drained boreal peatland forests in Finland. We hypothesized that the ash-induced changes in soil chemistry have led to long-term changes in soil microbial communities. To study this, we analyzed soil bacterial and archaeal communities from seven drained peatland forest sites in Finland. Each site had an ash fertilized plot (fertilized 8-43 years before sampling) and an unfertilized plot. Soil pH was higher at ash fertilized plots in five out of the seven sites. Pseudomonadota, Bryobacteraceae, and Planctomycetaceae were more abundant in samples from the control plots, whereas Actinomycetota were more abundant in samples from the ash fertilized plots. According to distance-based redundancy analysis, soil pH was important driver of soil bacterial and archaeal community structure. Site explained a greater proportion of community variation than treatment. Therefore, impacts of wood ash on soil in peatland forest stands should be considered by taking into account their site-specific factors and management history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.