ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026
Clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) PCR on bronchoscopic specimens for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated the performance of the Abbott RealTime Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) PCR (RT MTB) on bronchoscopic specimens using conventional culture as the reference standard in a low-Tuberculosis (TB) prevalence setting.
methodsA total of 6,988 specimens (4,682 bronchial aspirates [BAS] and 2,306 bronchoalveolar lavages [BAL]) from 4,118 patients with suspected pulmonary TB were included. When BAS and BAL specimens from the same bronchoscopy procedure were available, these were mixed 1:1 prior to culture inoculation and PCR testing. Following processing, specimens were inoculated into a Löwenstein-Jensen and a Bactec MGIT 960 tube and incubated at 37 °C for 3 months and at 35 °C for 8 weeks, respectively. RT MTB was performed as indicated by the manufacturer. RT MTB targets the insertion sequence IS6110 and the protein antigen B (PAB) gene, both highly conserved within the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Whole genome Next generation sequencing of clinical MTBC isolates was performed when indicated.
resultsAmong the 104 culture-positive specimens, 84 (1.2%) were detected by PCR. Additionally, 16 specimens (0.3% of all samples), from 16 patients, were PCR-positive despite negative culture results. Conversely, 20 specimens (0.4% of all samples), from 19 patients, were culture-positive but not detected by PCR. No significant differences were found between PCR-positive and PCR-negative specimens with respect to the number of IS6110 copies per isolate or PAB gene sequences (P = 0.69). Finally, there were 4,683 specimens (97.4%) from the remaining 4,014 patients tested PCR-negative/Culture-negative. Following the resolution of discrepancies based on clinical grounds the sensitivity and specificity of RT MTB were 83.9% (CI 95%, 76.0-90.0) and 99.9% (CI 95%, 99.9-99.9), respectively. These results exceed the minimum performance requirements defined in the WHO Target Product Profiles for molecular TB diagnostics. Although RT MTB is not a point-of-care test but rather a moderate-complexity automated NAAT, it is recommended by WHO as part of the Abbott RealTime MTB/MTB RIF-INH testing algorithm, in which MTBC detection by RT MTB is followed by reflex testing with the MTB RIF/INH assay for detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistance.
conclusionRT MTB shows a good performance on bronchoscopic specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42714826What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.