Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42714753›Full record

ReviewGenes & genomics2026

From bacterial to microbiome-derived vesicles: genome-informed identity, source qualification, and translational quality for skin-directed cosmetics.

Hyewon Pak, Taeyoon Park, Myoung Jin Ho

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyewon Pak *Drug Delivery Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Taeyoon Park *Drug Delivery Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Myoung Jin HoDrug Delivery Laboratory, College of Pharmacy, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea. butable@dankook.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-3418

Funding

Dankook University 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial extracellular vesicles (BEVs) are increasingly proposed as materials for skin-directed cosmetics, yet rapid adoption of "exosome" terminology has outpaced clarity on their origin, composition, and manufacturing quality. This review argues that the value of BEVs depends on scientific discipline rather than marketing appeal, and that they are promising because they are biologically potent, not because they are intrinsically benign. We retain BEVs as the scientific umbrella term for vesicles released by bacteria and we propose the term microbiome-derived vesicles (MDVs) as the consumer-facing designation for qualified commensal BEVs - a surface term that avoids the difficulty of "bacterial" while its definition preserves bacterial provenance. We develop a three-axis framework for BEV identity that integrates compositional analysis, producer-strain genomics, and functional or safety profiling, and we position whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as decisive for source qualification and mechanistic interpretation but insufficient to prove the efficacy of a purified preparation. Building on this framework, we summarize isolation, purification, and analytical characterization requirements; interpret current skin-efficacy evidence in light of its methodological limits; and discuss formulation, cosmetic application, regulatory positioning, and manufacturable quality. We conclude that transparent bacterial provenance, reproducible preparation, and evidence proportionate to the claims made are prerequisites for evaluating commensal BEVs, described for skin applications as MDVs, as a scientifically defined cosmetic platform.

Indexed as

Bacterial extracellular vesiclesCosmetic ingredientMicrobiome-derived vesiclesQuality controlSkin microbiomeWhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.