ReviewBlood research2026
CRS and ICANS: Early detection and personalized management.
Review in Blood research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T-cell-redirected immunotherapies, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, have transformed the treatment of relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies. However, cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) remain the major immune-mediated toxicities that can complicate treatment delivery and contribute to morbidity and non-relapse mortality. CRS is characterized by systemic inflammatory amplification involving activated T cells, tumor cells, monocytes/macrophages, endothelial activation, and cytokine networks. ICANS is biologically related to CRS but has distinct features, including endothelial injury, blood-brain barrier disruption, and central nervous system inflammation. Standardized grading systems and structured neurologic assessments provide a common framework for recognition; however, optimal care increasingly requires risk-adapted and individualized strategies. Baseline disease burden, systemic inflammation, endothelial vulnerability, organ reserve, treatment platform, and product-specific toxicity profiles may help identify patients requiring closer monitoring or earlier intervention. Although prediction models and emerging monitoring approaches may improve early recognition, their roles should complement rather than replace clinical judgment. Management should balance timely toxicity control with the preservation of antitumor efficacy, avoidance of excessive immunosuppression, and careful attention to infection and cytopenia risks. For refractory CRS or ICANS, phenotype-directed escalation and multidisciplinary care are essential. This review summarizes the current concepts in the biology, recognition, risk prediction, early detection, and personalized management of CRS and ICANS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.