ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Real-world evaluation of low-earth-orbit satellite communication for surgical telementoring: implications for future robotic surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable communication is a prerequisite for future robotic surgery and surgical telementoring, particularly in geographically remote and disaster-affected regions. As a preparatory step toward these applications, we evaluated the real-world performance of low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellite communication using laparoscopic surgical telementoring as an experimental model. Starlink-based communication was evaluated in three stepwise telementoring experiments: an intra-urban test in Tokyo (~ 15 km), an interhospital test between Fukuoka and Beppu (~ 100 km), and a long-distance test between Yamagata and Fukuoka (~ 1,000 km). Multiple Starlink terminals with bonding router configurations were used to assess communication redundancy. Real-time surgical video transmission with remote annotation was performed throughout the experiments. In the Tokyo experiment, communication was established but was affected by frequent bitrate fluctuations and intermittent image freezing. In the Fukuoka-Beppu experiment, stable bidirectional communication could not be maintained because of a combination of local-network connectivity limitations, Starlink WAN connectivity losses, and insufficient cellular fallback bandwidth. In the Yamagata-Fukuoka experiment, communication was stable on Day 1 (mean latency, 34.4 ms; mean bitrate, 2.51 Mbps), enabling smooth telementoring. However, using the same equipment and network configuration on the following day, latency increased to a maximum of 765 ms and 16.7% of bitrate measurements fell below 2 Mbps, resulting in marked deterioration of communication quality. These findings indicate temporal variability in communication performance across the two sessions. The LEO-satellite based end-to-end communication configurations tested in this study did not consistently demonstrate the reliability required for clinical surgical telementoring. Although laparoscopic telementoring was used as the experimental model, these findings provide practical information for the design and evaluation of communication infrastructure for future robotic telesurgical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42714728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.