ArticleDiscover nano2026
Numerical modeling of 2D sutterby fluid stagnation-point flow over a stretching surface using levenberg-marquardt backpropagation.
Article in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) prediction of Sutterby fluid flow is important in polymer synthesis, industrial coatings, aviation and thermal regulation, and this work utilizes the Levenberg-Marquardt backpropagation (LMBP) method. The calculation of Sutterby nanofluid stagnation point problem over a stretching surface is solved by applying an artificial neural network (ANN) based on LMBP. In this case, the mathematical equations for the non-Newtonian Sutterby dynamic system are dimensionless velocity and energy equations. The key novelty in this investigation is the use of a very powerful soft-computing neural network framework for mapping this particular non-Newtonian configuration, for which the high-fidelity benchmark reference data sets are created using the classical numerical bvp4c solver. The data set is split into 76% for training the network, 13% for validating the network, and 11% for testing the network. The accuracy of the ANN-LMBP is shown by the absolute error charts, which show low mean squared error for both mass and heat transfer systems. The skin friction rises by up to 44.6289% from the angle of the inclined angle of the magnetic field parameter 30° to 90° and energy transfer decreases by 11.1167% respectively. On the other hand, the rate of energy propagation is enhanced by up to 14.4513% with the increment of the thermal radiation factor from 3.0 to 7.0. The error histograms, mean squared errors, correlation coefficients, state transition and regression metrics as a whole certify the accuracy, competency and reliability of the proposed ANN-LMBP approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.