Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42714702›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental geochemistry and health2026

Risk assessment of radionuclides in different environmental matrices in the State of Qatar, Arabian Gulf.

S Veerasingam, V Vinothini, M Ranjani, Rania Edrees Adam Mohammad, G Suresh, S Rajendran, Kishor Kumar Sadasivuni, Saud Ghani, Fatima Al-Khayat

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S VeerasingamEnvironmental Science Center, Qatar University, P.O Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. v.subramanian@qu.edu.qa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1791-3418
V VinothiniEnvironmental Science Center, Qatar University, P.O Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
M RanjaniEnvironmental Science Center, Qatar University, P.O Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Rania Edrees Adam MohammadEnvironmental Science Center, Qatar University, P.O Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
G SureshDepartment of Humanities and Sciences/Physics Division, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (DU), Payanoor, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 603104, India.
S RajendranEnvironmental Science Center, Qatar University, P.O Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Kishor Kumar SadasivuniCenter for Advanced Materials, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Saud GhaniMechanical and Industrial Engineering, Qatar University, 2713, Doha, Qatar.
Fatima Al-KhayatDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

Qatar Research, Development and Innovation Council CCEC01-1029-230098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental radioactivity in Qatar arises from a combination of naturally occurring radionuclides (NORM) and technically enhanced NORM (TENORM) associated with industrial activities. This study presents a comprehensive systematic review with quantitative synthesis of radionuclide concentrations across multiple environmental matrices, including soil, sediment, groundwater, seawater, building materials, and marine biota, extracted from research papers published between 1980 and September 2025. Data synthesis reveals those natural radionuclides such as

Indexed as

Radiation MonitoringRadioisotopesConstruction MaterialsQatarRadiumRisk AssessmentSeawaterSoil Pollutants, RadioactiveRadioisotopesRadiumSoil Pollutants, RadioactiveArtificial radionuclidesEnvironmental radioactivityNatural radionuclidesQatarRisks

Identifiers

PMID42714702
PMCPMC13558424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.