ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Effects of yeast, tannin, and amylolytic enzyme combinations in high-concentrate diets on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and serum metabolites in Lambs.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the combined effects of yeast, tannin, and amylolytic enzymes on intake, digestibility, and biochemical parameters of lambs fed a high-concentrate diet. A total of five lambs were used in a 5 × 5 Latin square design. Diets consisted of 75% concentrate and 25% roughage. The treatments were: control (without additive), TE (tannin and enzyme), EY (enzyme and yeast), TY (tannin and yeast), and TYE (tannin, yeast, and enzyme). Digestibility trials were conducted to determine nutrient intake and digestibility, as well as urinary, fecal, and serum parameters. Analyses of variance were applied, and means were compared using Tukey's test at a 5% significance level. No differences were observed in nutrient intake or urinary and fecal parameters with the inclusion of feed additives (P > 0.05). However, dry matter digestibility increased with additive inclusion (775 vs. 749 g kg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.