Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Lung ultrasound versus chest radiography for the detection of early postoperative pulmonary complications in children undergoing cardiac surgery.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary complications are a major cause of morbidity following congenital heart surgery in children. This pilot study evaluated detection rates of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) compared with chest X-ray (CXR) for early identification of postoperative pulmonary complications in pediatric cardiac surgery patients. This prospective observational pilot study enrolled 30 pediatric patients (aged < 4 years) undergoing congenital heart surgery (RACHS-1 categories 1-3) at a single tertiary center (March 2024-March 2025). LUS using a standardized 12-zone protocol was compared with bedside CXR at three assessment timepoints: within 6 h postoperatively (T1), pre-extubation (T2), and post-extubation (T3). Diagnostic agreement was assessed by Cohen's kappa. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. LUS and CXR showed equivalent detection of pulmonary congestion at T1 (63.3%; p = 1.000). LUS detected higher rates of pleural effusion (40.0% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.002) and consolidation (56.7% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.069) at T1. Extubation failure occurred in 16.7% (n = 5) and was associated with prolonged ICU stay, longer ventilation, and greater inotropic support (all p ≤ 0.040). On multivariable logistic regression, longer inotropic support duration was associated with lower odds of successful extubation (exploratory analysis, OR 0.52, p = 0.009); imaging variables were not significant (all p > 0.27); findings warrant cautious interpretation given the small sample.
conclusionIn this pilot cohort, LUS demonstrated higher detection rates for early postoperative pleural effusion and consolidation compared with CXR, supporting its role as a complementary bedside tool. Extubation outcomes were primarily driven by hemodynamic factors. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in up to 76% of children after cardiac surgery and prolong mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. • Chest X-ray is the standard bedside imaging tool but has limited sensitivity for early parenchymal and pleural pathology. WHAT IS NEW: • Lung ultrasound detected pleural effusion and consolidation at higher rates than CXR across all three postoperative timepoints. • Serial bedside LUS enabled dynamic longitudinal monitoring of complication resolution over 11 postoperative days, beyond what static CXR can provide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.