SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Understanding the gut microbiota to shape the future of intestinal failure care: a systematic review of the evidence.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intestinal failure (IF) patients suffer a loss of intestinal mass or function and alterations in gut microbiota (GM) composition and function. Our objectives are to (1) characterise GM in IF, (2) explore associations between GM and IF health outcomes, and (3) analyse the effect of GM-based interventions on disease course. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to March 2026. Eligible studies included observational studies, prospective studies, and clinical trials in patients with IF, without age or date restrictions. The main outcomes identified included GM diversity indices, GM taxonomy, and IF complications. Risk of bias was assessed using CASP checklists. Twenty-eight studies including children (4 case reports, 1 case series, 19 cohort studies [14 cross-sectional, 5 prospective], 1 quasi-experimental study, 3 RCTs, for a total of 391 cases) and 19 studies including adults (2 case reports, 1 case series, 14 cohort studies [12 cross-sectional, 2 prospective], 2 quasi-experimental studies, for a total of 604 cases) were analysed. Given the heterogeneity among studies, only qualitative synthesis was performed. Reduced alpha diversity and marked phylum-level dysbiosis are consistently reported in patients with IF compared with healthy controls. Different IF aetiologies and bowel anatomy are associated with distinctive GM patterns. IF complication rate increases with the magnitude of GM alteration. GM-modifying interventions are poorly studied. Encouraging improvements in GM dysbiosis, enteral tolerance, and IF complications have been reported in observational studies using various interventions. Still, these findings are not confirmed in RCTs. A distinguishing GM dysbiosis, associated with worse clinical outcomes, clearly emerges in patients with IF. The low quality and heterogeneity of the studies analysed limit data interpretation. The need for a better definition of microbiota assessment, both as a bedside tool and as a therapeutic target, is highlighted as a prominent study topic for the future of IF rehabilitation. What is Known: • Intestinal failure yields substantial alterations in gut microbiota habitat, leading to dysbiosis. • The severity of dysbiosis influences multiple clinically relevant health outcomes. What is New: • IF aetiology, short bowel subtype, and patient age influence GM alterations in IF patients. • Limited longitudinal data suggest that some adverse outcomes are a result of specific dysbiosis pattern progression. • Therapies targeting GM are promising tools for personalised intestinal rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42714683What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.