ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Modified scalp block and total intravenous anesthesia for frontal craniotomy in a dog with a meningioma: a technical case report.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial meningiomas are among the most common primary central nervous system tumors in dogs, and surgical resection is associated with prolonged survival for rostrotentorial lesions. This report describes the anesthetic and surgical management of a dog undergoing frontal craniotomy using a modified scalp block technique. A 9-year-old male Shih Tzu with seizures and forebrain signs was diagnosed with a rostrotentorial intracranial mass compatible with meningioma on computed tomography. Frontal craniotomy was performed under total intravenous anesthesia with propofol target-controlled infusion combined with bilateral frontal and modified zygomaticotemporal scalp block using bupivacaine. The modified technique involved caudal needle insertion along the zygomatic arch with dorsomedial redirection toward the orbital ligament and fractionated anesthetic deposition. Cardiovascular parameters remained stable during the four major nociceptive events analyzed-skin incision, muscle dissection, craniotomy, and durotomy-with no clinically relevant increases beyond approximately 20% of stabilized post-induction baseline values; no rescue analgesia or adjustments in target propofol plasma concentration were required intraoperatively. During cranioplasty, the patient developed hemodynamic instability associated with blood loss, which improved after transfusion therapy. Postoperative recovery was satisfactory, with neurological improvement and no immediate complications. The association of total intravenous anesthesia and modified scalp block may represent a feasible neuroanesthetic strategy for canine craniotomy, contributing to nociceptive control and cardiovascular stability. Further studies are needed to validate the technique and its analgesic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.