ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Tolvaptan in heart failure: Contemporary evidence and a framework for precision decongestion.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congestion remains a major therapeutic target in heart failure (HF), despite advances in guideline-directed medical therapy. Tolvaptan, a selective vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, promotes electrolyte-sparing free-water excretion and therefore offers a mechanistically distinct approach to decongestion. Randomized trials have generally shown short-term increases in urine output and reductions in body weight, whereas effects on dyspnea and other congestion-related symptoms have been variable; importantly, no reduction in mortality or HF hospitalization has been established. This evidence has led to divergent clinical positioning: tolvaptan is approved in Japan for fluid retention inadequately controlled by other diuretics, whereas the United States and Europe do not approve it for HF congestion. This review critically summarizes the pharmacology, clinical evidence, and regional regulatory context of tolvaptan in HF. It then presents a conceptual two-stage framework incorporating potential pretreatment and early-response markers to inform patient selection, with particular attention to urine osmolality and emerging pathway-based biomarkers. The complementary roles of oral and intravenous formulations and evidence in selected clinical settings are also discussed. Current data support tolvaptan as a monitored adjunct for selected patients, not as routine therapy or a treatment with established prognostic benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42714631What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.