Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42714629›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2026

Do nectary morphology, anatomy, and nectar production differ between two Salvia taxa with contrasting floral traits and floral visitor assemblages?

J I Agüero, M Gotelli, C A Micelotta, S S Aliscioni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J I AgüeroCátedra Botánica General, Fac. de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. jaguero@agro.uba.ar.
M GotelliCátedra Botánica General, Fac. de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C A MicelottaCátedra Botánica General, Fac. de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
S S AliscioniCátedra Botánica General, Fac. de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floral nectaries are specialized structures that secrete nectar, a key floral reward mediating plant-pollinator interactions. Although floral morphology and nectar traits have been moderately studied in Salvia, the detailed structure and anatomy of nectaries remain less explored, limiting our understanding of their diversity and functional variation. This study compares the nectary accessibility, morphology, anatomy, and nectar production of two Salvia taxa with different floral traits and floral visitor assemblages: S. uliginosa and the the sterile hybrid cultivar S. 'Amistad'. Both possess annular, four-lobed nectaries positioned below the ovary, with the anterior lobe being the most developed. However, S. 'Amistad' exhibits significantly larger nectaries and produces higher nectar volumes (16.85 ± 1.13 µL) than S. uliginosa (0.36 ± 0.03 µL), with nectary size, particularly anterior lobe length, associated with nectar production differences. Anatomically, both taxa show a single-layered epidermis with open nectarostomata and a nectariferous parenchyma well supplied by vascular bundles containing phloem and xylem. Epidermal micromorphology differs between species: the cuticle is smooth in S. uliginosa but striate in S. 'Amistad'. Although bees dominated floral visitation in both taxa, hummingbirds accounted for a substantial proportion of visits (35.1%) to S. 'Amistad' and were the only visitors contacting its reproductive structures, whereas only bees contacted the reproductive structures of S. uliginosa. Because S. 'Amistad' is a sterile cultivar, floral visitor observations are interpreted in the context of differences in nectar accessibility, nectar production, and floral visitor assemblages rather than as evidence of pollinator-mediated selection. These comparative data reveal conserved nectary anatomy with subtle structural variation associated with nectar production differences between two Salvia taxa with contrasting visitor assemblages.

Indexed as

AnatomyFloral nectaryFloral visitorsLamiaceaeNectar production

Identifiers

PMID42714629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.