ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
Evaluation of diagnostic indicators using normalized CT attenuation values of the ovarian wall in contrast-enhanced CT for pediatric ovarian tumor torsion.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePediatric ovarian tumor torsion often presents with nonspecific symptoms, and delayed diagnosis can lead to ovarian necrosis. Although contrast-enhanced CT is frequently used, objective quantitative indicators have not been established. This study evaluated normalized ovarian wall CT attenuation (n-OWA) and a combined index incorporating white blood cell count (WBC).
methodsAmong 82 patients with surgically-treated ovarian tumor, 52 who underwent contrast-enhanced CT (15 with torsion and 37 without torsion) were analyzed. The n-OWA was calculated as the ovarian wall CT attenuation divided by the inferior vena cava attenuation. The WBC/n-OWA ratio was also evaluated. Group comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon test, and diagnostic performance was evaluated by an ROC analysis.
resultsThe n-OWA was significantly lower in the torsion group (0.25 vs. 0.31, p = 0.02), with an AUC of 0.71. The WBC/n-OWA ratio was significantly higher in the torsion group (44.8 vs. 19.9, p < 0.01) and showed improved diagnostic performance with an AUC of 0.86. At a cutoff of 25.4, the sensitivity and specificity were 1.00 and 0.70, respectively.
conclusionsThe n-OWA is an objective imaging biomarker for pediatric ovarian torsion. The WBC/n-OWA ratio may further improve diagnostic accuracy, particularly for excluding ovarian torsion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42714603What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.