Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42714474›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2026

Rehabilitation and the post-intensive care syndrome across the recovery continuum: a narrative review.

Stefan J Schaller, Teresa Cardoso, Sabrina Eggmann, Martina Hermann, Cheryl E Hickmann, Rahel Naef, Margo van Mol, Simone Piva, Emilio Rodriguez-Ruiz, Mahan Sadjadi and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Stefan J SchallerMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vienna, Austria. stefan.schaller@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6683-9584
Teresa CardosoIntensive Care Department, Hospital Padre Américo, Tâmega e Sousa Local Health Unit, Guilhufe, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2451-4260
Sabrina EggmannDepartment of Intensive Care and Neonatology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-7343
Martina HermannMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4669-2482
Cheryl E HickmannLaboratory of Effort and Movement and Condorcet-Epicura Research and Innovation Unit (URICE), Department of Motor Sciences, HEPH-Condorcet, Tournai, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4024-0207
Rahel NaefImplementation Science in Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5872-076X
Margo van MolDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-6054
Simone PivaDepartment of Emergency, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5483-8007
Emilio Rodriguez-RuizDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Clinic Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (CHUS), Galician Public Health System (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1447-877X
Mahan SadjadiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9729-5199
Akos TiboldiLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Greet Van den BergheDepartment and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, KU Leuven University, Louvain, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-1362
Marion WiegeleMedical University of Vienna, Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Clinical Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6153-6659
David McWilliamsUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9086-2557
Björn WeissCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
ESICM PICS&Rehab Section

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImproved survival from critical illness has produced a growing population of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors with new or worsened physical, cognitive, and mental-health impairment, defined as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), and frequent distress among families/caregivers (PICS-family, PICS-F). This narrative review synthesises the evidence in adults treated in high-resource settings.

methodsRather than a formal guideline process, we used a structured descriptive approach: for each recommendation, we identified the predominant study design, assessed the consistency of findings, summarised uncertainties, and assigned an evidence-strength label (high, moderate, low, or insufficient).

resultsWe summarise the definition of PICS and its overlap with related constructs (post-sepsis morbidity, chronic critical illness, post-COVID conditions, and frailty); the mechanisms linking acute injury to persistent disability, including skeletal-muscle pathobiology, neuroinflammation, mitochondrial and neuroendocrine dysfunction, and epigenetic change; and the instruments assessing the three PICS core domains (recommending a two-step assessment approach), as well as quality of life, across the care continuum. We describe preventive and rehabilitative interventions from the ICU (e.g., the ABCDEF bundle that includes light/no sedation, delirium prevention, early mobilisation and family participation) through the ward to the post-hospital phase, the heterogeneous organisation of post-ICU recovery services, PICS-F, the educational and cultural change needed, and the health-system and policy context. PICS-F affects 20-60% of relatives; nurse-led family interventions seem promising.

conclusionThe evidence base remains limited and heterogeneous, preventing firm recommendations. Research priorities include harmonised outcome measurement, phenotyping of recovery trajectories, the optimal dose and timing of rehabilitation, and rigorous comparison of follow-up models.

Indexed as

Critical illness survivorshipFamilyICU-acquired weaknessIntensive care follow-upPost-intensive care syndromeRehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.